|
Luc Anselin
- Current Working Papers
(papers
are removed if and when published, unless working papers are different
from published version)
(see
also selected publications)
|
| |
|
|
|
Working
Papers
|
|
| |
- Anselin, Spatial
externalities
- Anselin and Moreno,
Properties of tests for spatial error components (revised)
- Anselin,
Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and
spatial econometrics
- Messner and Anselin,
Spatial analyses of homicide with areal data
- Anselin,
Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation
of spatial regression models
- Anselin, Syabri and Smirnov,
Visualizing multivariate spatial correlation with dynamically
linked windows
- Anselin, Bongiovanni and
Lowenberg-DeBoer, A spatial econometric approach to the economics
of site-specific nitrogen management in corn production
- Kim, Phipps and Anselin,
Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial
hedonic approach
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Luc Anselin
Spatial externalities
(forthcoming International
Regional Science Review)
Abstract:
Introduction to the special issue on spatial externalities.
|
|
|
Download/View
pdf file (39K, 6pp) |
|
| |
|
|
|
Luc Anselin and Rosina
Moreno
Properties of tests for spatial error components
(forthcoming Regional
Science and Urban Economics)
Abstract:
In spatial econometrics, the typical alternative of spatial autocorrelation
is expressed in the form of a spatial autorregressive process. While the
bulk of the literature is devoted to specification tests and estimation
methods for this model, alternatives have been suggested as well. In this
paper, we consider an alternative that takes the form of the spatial error
components formulation proposed by Kelejian and Robinson (1995). We consider
a number of specification tests against this alternative, based on both
a maximum likelihood framework as well as on a general method of moments
estimation approach. We compare the performance of these tests in a series
of Monte Carlo simulation experiments for a range of different spatial
layouts and under a number of different error distributions.
|
|
|
Download/View
pdf file (182K, 26pp) |
|
| |
|
|
|
Luc
Anselin
Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics
(forthcoming: International
Regional Science Review)
Abstract:
This paper outlines a taxonomy of spatial econometric model specifications
that incorporate spatial externalities in various ways. The point of departure
is a reduced form in which local or global spillovers are expressed as spatial
multipliers. From this, a range of familiar and less familiar specifications
is derived for the structural form of a spatial regression.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve Messner
and Luc Anselin
Spatial analyses
of homicide with areal data
Abstract:
This paper highlights the ways in which the application of recently developed
techniques for spatial analysis contribute to our understanding of homicide. We
begin with a brief historical review of the role of geographic space in the
sociological study of crime and then discuss generic methodological issues
involved in the study of areal units. The logic of important techniques for
spatial analysis is explained and illustrated using two empirical case studies
of variation in homicide rates across U.S. counties. One case study involves
the use of techniques of Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis (ESDA), and the
other applies spatial regression modeling. The analyses yield suggestive
evidence of diffusion processes and also reveal the incompleteness of well-accepted
baseline models of homicide rates. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of
pressing issues of future research on the spatial dynamics of crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Anselin
Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of
spatial regression models
(forthcoming: Agricultural Economics)
Abstract:
This paper reviews a number of conceptual issues pertaining to the
implementation of an explicit "spatial" perspective in applied econometrics.
It provides an overview of the motivation for including spatial effects in
regression models, both from a theory-driven as well as from a data-driven
perspective. Considerable attention is paid to the inferential framework
necessary to carry out estimation and testing and the different assumptions,
constraints and implications embedded in the various specifications
available in the literature. The review combines insights from the traditional
spatial econometrics literature as well as from geostatistics, biostatistics
and medical image analysis.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Luc Anselin, Ibnu Syabri
and Oleg Smirnov
Visualizing multivariate spatial correlation with dynamically linked
windows
Abstract:
Several recent efforts have focused on adding exploratory data analysis
functionality to geographic information systems (GIS) by integrating
established statistical software with a GIS. In this paper, we outline an
alternative approach, where the functionality is built from scratch, using a
combination of small libraries of dedicated functions, rather than relying on
the full scope of existing software suites. The suggested approach is modular
and freestanding. Whithin an overall framework of dynamically linked windows,
it combines a cartographic representation of data on a map with traditional
statistical graphics, such as histograms, box plots, and scatterplots. It
extends earlier work on the visualization of spatial correlation to a multivariate
setting, introducing a Moran Scatterplot Matrix and Multivariate LISA Maps.
The new program (DynESDA2) works on both point and polygon coverages,
implements true brushing of maps, as well as the usual linking and brushing
between maps and statistical graphs.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Luc
Anselin, Rodolfo Bongiovanni and Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer
A spatial econometric approach to the economics of site-specific
nitrogen management in corn production
Abstract:
Spatial technologies such as GPS and GIS increasingly form the basis for site-specific
management in crop production. This paper assesses the contribution of an explicit
spatial econometric methodology in the estimation of crop yield functions that are
used to optimize fertilizer application. The specific case study is for Nitrogen (N)
application to corn production in Argentina, where the implementation of variable
rate technology (VRT) requires methods that use inexpensive information and that focus
on the inputs and variability common to Argentine growing areas. The objective of the
paper is to assess the economic value of the application of spatial regression analysis
to yield monitor data as a means to optimize variable rate fertilizer strategies. The
data in the case study are from on-farm trials with a uniform N rate along strips and
a randomized complete block design to estimate site-specific crop response functions.
Spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity are taken into account in regression
estimation of N response functions by landscape position, in the form of both a spatial
autoregressive error structure and groupwise heteroskedasticity. Both uniform rate and
VRT returns are computed from a partial budget model. The results suggest that N response
differs significantly by landscape position, and that VRA for N may be modestly profitable
depending on the VRT fee level. Profitability depends crucially on the model
specification used, with all spatial models consistently suggesting profitability, whereas
the non-spatial models do not.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Chong Won Kim,
Tim T. Phipps and Luc Anselin
Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach
(forthcoming: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management)
Abstract:
The primary objective of this paper is to improve the methodology for estimating
hedonic price functions when the data are inherently spatial. A spatial-econometric
hedonic housing price model is developed and estimated for the Seoul metropolitan
area to measure the marginal value of improvements in SO2 and NOX concentrations.
Diagnostic testing favored the spatial lag model over the spatial error model.
Results showed that SO2 pollution levels had a significant impact on housing prices
while NOX pollution did not. The authors attribute this differential impact to the
relatively higher levels of SO2 pollution when compared with pollution standards
and the relative recency of NOX pollution. Marginal WTP for a 4% improvement in mean
SO2 concentrations is about $2,333 or 1.4% of mean housing price.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| bio
courses papers
projects talks
home |